Training focuses on the interests of public officials and and can be customized to the specific needs of any public body. A number of different programs are available, covering key OPRA issues. Stay on top of changes in OPRA legal requirements with training presented by Lew Scheindlin. Post navigation ← Appellate Division Issues Significant Published Opinion on OPRA Litigation and Attorney Fee Awards A Reminder from the Appellate Division: Custodians May be Fined Only if They Knowingly and Willfully Violate OPRA → This entry was posted in Court opinions and tagged attorney bills, Court opinions on Februby lscheindlin. The court invalidated these redactions as well, again because these expenses did not disclose any privileged information. For invoices, include the VENDOR name, AMOUNT of the invoice, and any special. A redacted invoice for ground service costs for one leg of the Governor General’s week-long Middle East trip to Expo 2020 in Dubai earlier this year.
The Boro had also redacted certain expenses shown on the bills, for filing fees, mailing fees, and a monthly retainer. All social security numbers must be redacted before sending documents to A/P. There is a legitimate argument that can be made as to redacting a portion of the invoice, if that information could compromise the preparation of a lawsuit.
REDACTED INVOICE TRIAL
The court stated that these redactions violated OPRA, because the descriptions did not reveal “confidential information, trial strategy, or work The redactions here all shielded the type of descriptions that are typically put on an attorney’s bill, such as, for example, review correspondence participate in phone conference with court, or with identified individuals and draft letter brief in advance of oral argument. The Appellate Division reviewed the invoices and concluded that none of the entries were covered by the privilege. When entering or edit an invoice/payment for an FMS federal vendor, the user will. Invoice (AFL Aug 2018) 8 7 18 Redacted Item Preview remove-circle Share or Embed This Item. Boro of Lawnside, the custodian redacted “every word of every line item” description of the attorney’s services on the invoices, as falling within the attorney-client privilege. Interfaces with Central Fee have also been updated.
For the first time, the Appellate Division (in an unpublished opinion) has addressed this aspect of OPRA, and confirmed that this interpretation of the attorney invoice language is correct. I’ve always understood this provision to mean that it’s permissible to redact anything on the bill that would reveal something about legal advice or litigation strategy. OPRA states that attorney bills must be disclosed, but they may be redacted to remove any attorney-client privileged information on them.
0 kommentar(er)
